JUST IN: Trump SUPPORTS Rep. LaMonica McIver being CHARED for assauIting ICE agents in Newark

In a recent development that has reignited discussions on law enforcement and political accountability, former President Donald Trump has publicly supported the charging of Democratic Representative LaMonica McIver for allegedly assaulting Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents during a confrontation outside a Newark, New Jersey, detention center. This incident, which occurred earlier this month, has become a focal point in the ongoing debate over immigration policy and the enforcement of law and order under the Trump administration.

### The Incident

On May 9, 2025, Representative McIver, along with other New Jersey lawmakers and Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, were involved in a scuffle with federal agents outside the Delaney Hall Detention Center. The confrontation arose during a protest against the Trump administration’s mass deportation policies. According to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), body camera footage captured McIver elbowing an ICE agent, leading to charges of assault, impeding, and interfering with law enforcement.

Mayor Baraka, who was initially charged with trespassing, saw those charges dropped by the Justice Department. However, McIver’s case has proceeded, marking her as the first federal officeholder targeted by the Trump administration for such actions. This selective prosecution has sparked accusations of political motivation from McIver and her supporters, who argue that the charges are an attempt to criminalize legislative oversight and deter opposition to the administration’s policies.

### Trump’s Stance

In a video shared by political commentator Nick Sortor on X, Trump is seen walking through the Capitol Hill corridors, flanked by aides, as he comments on the incident. “She was shoving federal agents. She was out of control! The days of that crap are OVER! We’re going to have LAW AND ORDER!” Trump declared, emphasizing his administration’s commitment to maintaining order and enforcing the law rigorously.

This statement aligns with Trump’s broader campaign promise to implement “the largest domestic deportation operation” in U.S. history, a policy that has faced significant opposition from Democratic lawmakers and immigrant rights advocates. The former president’s support for charging McIver underscores his administration’s hardline approach to immigration enforcement and its willingness to pursue legal action against political figures who challenge these policies.

### Political and Legal Repercussions

The charging of Representative McIver has elicited a strong response from both sides of the political spectrum. McIver herself has denounced the charges as “purely political,” asserting that they are designed to intimidate and silence critics of the administration’s deportation efforts. In a statement, she said, “This administration will never stop me from working for the people in our district and standing up for what is right. I look forward to the truth being laid out clearly in court.”

Conversely, supporters of Trump’s policies view the charges as a necessary step to ensure accountability and maintain law and order. Alina Habba, acting U.S. attorney for the District of New Jersey, announced the charges on X, highlighting the alleged assault on the ICE agent as a violation of federal law. This incident has further polarized the debate over immigration, with critics arguing that it represents an overreach of executive power, while proponents see it as a reaffirmation of legal standards.

### Broader Context

The confrontation at the Newark ICE facility is part of a larger pattern of clashes between political figures and law enforcement under Trump’s second term. The administration’s aggressive stance on immigration has led to numerous protests and legal challenges, with several Democratic lawmakers and local officials facing scrutiny for their opposition. The invocation of the 1798 Alien Enemies Act and the subsequent Supreme Court ruling allowing deportations to continue have heightened tensions, making incidents like the one involving McIver particularly significant.

Moreover, the economic and political pressure on recipient countries to accept deportees, as noted by experts, adds another layer of complexity to the situation. The Trump administration’s policies aim to address what it perceives as an “invasion” of unauthorized immigrants, prioritizing the removal of individuals with criminal records and suspected national security threats. This approach has been met with resistance from those who argue it undermines humanitarian considerations and legislative oversight.

### Conclusion

The charging of Representative LaMonica McIver for allegedly assaulting ICE agents represents a critical juncture in the ongoing battle over immigration policy in the United States. Former President Trump’s vocal support for these charges reflects his administration’s commitment to law and order, even as it draws criticism for potentially politicizing legal proceedings. As the case progresses through the courts, it will likely serve as a litmus test for the balance between executive authority and legislative accountability, shaping the future of immigration enforcement and political discourse in America.